My writeup on obstacles to skills cultivation in Malaysian schools is the cover story of the February issue of Penang Monthly is . Read it here.
The Penang Monthly piece is based on my 2016 working paper for the Penang Institute, which can be downloaded here.
Continuing with the PISA 2015 theme, I wrote a Cilisos piece here giving an introduction to PISA and explaining the issues with Malaysia’s PISA 2015 data.
Cilisos is like Cracked.com for Malaysian current issues, though somewhat politer. They also have a Malay-language counterpart, Soscili, as well as a wonderful team who put up with my rambling and nitpicking about statistics. (Thanks, Uihua!)
Last week, I spoke on BFM, a business-oriented Malaysian radio station, in a ten-minute segment about the issues with Malaysia’s PISA 2015 results. The podcast is available here.
Background: The results from PISA 2015 (i.e. the most recent cycle of the triennial Programme for International Student Assessment) were released on the 6th of December.
When the results came out, many Malaysians were surprised to find that we weren’t included in the main results list, because sampling issues meant that our data weren’t comparable to other countries, or to previous PISA cycles. (For one local commentary, see this press statement by Ong Kian Ming, an opposition MP.)
Two personal notes:
- As far as research goes, it’s pretty frustrating that Malaysia’s 2015 PISA data have these quality issues. As far as I know, PISA and TIMSS (whatever their shortcomings and challenges) are the only accessible individual-level data on Malaysian education, because the Ministry doesn’t release national student and exam data.
- Evidently, I should get more practice at speaking about technical things in complete sentences, haha.